|
回复 9# 咕噜
' y$ d3 f. f5 p! {: X
( n3 Y6 `3 \0 z' E- q0 z) v, j* pHow am I supposed to have seen him? Even if I hypothetically have "seen" him, I ....... Oh Crap......That's already a spurious causal relation, no matter what results I want to draw from my fore mentioned assumption...4 K8 u) k0 g, Y" J n$ j6 W0 w
6 f Z/ w7 K, t
Boy... that was complicated....& u7 t( m, e! y- a& ?0 r& E9 J
* ?# a* L0 Q7 |# F' M$ U1 k% f1 Y
' s e( A5 l0 d$ ~% Y" N
! Z' z8 H/ H* I6 M" b( C1 t% YHow I hate German and love English.... |
|