|
回复 9# 咕噜 ! m" g0 T4 y3 i. ?9 `0 k. V0 i5 B0 ]
" b# k) A A! W3 }) S- C, a. c* s
How am I supposed to have seen him? Even if I hypothetically have "seen" him, I ....... Oh Crap......That's already a spurious causal relation, no matter what results I want to draw from my fore mentioned assumption...3 K3 I7 V4 \$ P+ {" G* O
( m+ k7 @6 d! G$ f+ _& G- hBoy... that was complicated....
% @) N. D Q7 @1 F- g, L- [' N$ Q6 k3 y/ E
4 F% g2 U/ w/ Y: g0 W# U
/ f: u, E+ D: O9 G$ u5 q
How I hate German and love English.... |
|