感谢国家~~~！！！

猛犸象

2007年，京沪高 铁投资预算增至2200亿元。
　　2008年，中央推 出40000亿投资计划。
　　2008年，中国免 除46个国家400多亿债务。
. G4 `/ Y) h2 F　　2009年，中国免 除32个国家150笔债务。
　　2009年，中国对 非援助累计760亿人民币。
+ S- s' }* Q3 W9 D) ~- x; L; p6 {　　2009年, 中国累 计对朝援助达8000亿元
　　2009年，累计购 买美国国债达到8100亿美元,累计购买外债达到到20000亿美元!
( U6 q8 o& @2 ~　　2009年，中国公车 消费每年达到9000亿人民币。
, T# B& C: E7 }　   2009年，中石 油称：“加薪10亿是小钱。”
  F2 n6 f8 G' Z8 Y- y6 Q4 l4 u1 U　　2009年, 上海 更换5000块路牌花费2亿, 平均每块路牌4万元!
4 ~/ ]# a) L8 A: @8 U$ N' B6 ~# L　   2009年，中国信贷 总额近100000亿人民币
　　2008年，北京奥运 共耗资3000亿人民币。
* y% ^% O2 |6 J, T　　2010年，上海世 博会共耗资4000亿人民币
　　2010年，省10 分钟，沪 杭 磁 悬浮耗资350亿。
　　2010年，中国 承诺对朝鲜700亿投资计划。
0 o4 y8 p1 }2 h　　　　.....
, a* T7 t1 I+ q, M' }　　2010年，西南 五省大旱，6000万 人受灾，损失200多亿, 中央拨付 旱灾救灾资金1.6亿元。

, m- X7 U) B) o# K6 ]. u
　　截止至2010年4月20日晚22时，中央向玉树灾区共拨付救灾款5亿元。
8 t. E" Y8 H- b. O5 S　　　　
' f$ }% R: V$ y7 g        感谢国家~~~！！！

6 T) z  i' j9 A0 P7 `5 }) K2 j7 }7 C

dahuludekeai

五毛五美分都很多，大家就在这里随便谈谈，干嘛乱扣帽子。
我等P民找个地方随便说说而已，非得争个死去活来 ...
9 g9 E9 p& T6 ?9 q慕尼黑求租 发表于 23.4.2010 12:00

" ^6 G) p1 [8 Q9 m$ _
    re这个

慕尼黑求租

五毛五美分都很多，大家就在这里随便谈谈，干嘛乱扣帽子。
# z9 O! f0 T: L6 f8 C6 K+ ?0 O我等P民找个地方随便说说而已，非得争个死去活来。。。

大雄

没想到5毛活动范围很广啊
, S; K0 `+ L: W% gmychippman 发表于 22.4.2010 21:19

# [. x" W7 H9 r. O* u! N2 [9 W. v( i
0 l! W/ A( @4 D9 p& z+ }9 H你还好意思说人家是五毛
# Q5 i# j1 N5 I" _1 N看看自己的发贴数再说话

月之女祭司

动不动就给人套帽子的是你吧。。。
8 M- f4 g$ U; n$ p3 w5 y# q
  u( t& d) N  H# V# e% P5 w8 s7 ^  话说，地震的确是不可测的。所以都着重在建筑抗震上了。
5 |. ~& d/ B. f应该从 ...
* j/ ^# e) ^. R+ E慕尼黑求租 发表于 23.4.2010 11:44

4 ^8 C8 p) \% |
% j$ U4 M  v) s+ u8 t* I7 s

没想到5毛活动范围很广啊
+ |+ x- N" Z/ w% N8 F  ?mychippman 发表于 22.4.2010 21:19

: ^/ h2 @: m! }7 h" b5 m% `
* y! U, \1 _- s* h0 F* o8 `9 @- y

哈哈哈，那是，要不然我怎么才能“不可理喻”~~~~~~~~
dahuludekeai 发表于 22.4.2010 22:06

$ ]5 Q% V% Z% H. ^9 t2 ?8 F* ^5 U
* Y  Y. g, s+ a6 ~
同学，请爬楼。另外我既然说请考虑让她加入，就表示我认为她不是了，何来扣帽子？
' V% s" z: n: b' k# F7 f9 V* b' I7 Y2 q0 q
我也同意重点在建筑抗震和国民教育上，问题楼主不答应啊，人家非要说地震局30年都没正确预测过地震……自己去看70楼。
/ Z- w$ Z. _+ u
可笑的是仅有的几次地震成功预测就有一次在中国。

大雄

是时候啦！
转深水区吧！

慕尼黑求租

另外希望版上的独轮运人士认真考虑一下dahuludekeai同学加入组织的问题。该同学拒绝学习，拒绝理性思考，缺 ...
月之女祭司 发表于 23.4.2010 11:19

; H, X0 k. Z, ^" [

& y6 p& }8 q0 i  F/ @6 j动不动就给人套帽子的是你吧。。。
, y3 F# F1 P( B) d( N
  话说，地震的确是不可测的。所以都着重在建筑抗震上了。
$ h% W" R2 l0 _- Y' P+ }应该从这个角度来讨论嘛。。。不要动不动就给人套帽子说人家是轮子，论战不诛心。

dahuludekeai

另外希望版上的独轮运人士认真考虑一下dahuludekeai同学加入组织的问题。该同学拒绝学习，拒绝理性思考，缺 ...
  |. D0 W! E( {: S  I月之女祭司 发表于 23.4.2010 11:19

' m& P) Y4 f* U
$ s  |1 b+ d  U5 N5 J
4 v' _, Q7 s( f8 k    go on, pls....

月之女祭司

另外希望版上的独轮运人士认真考虑一下dahuludekeai同学加入组织的问题。该同学拒绝学习，拒绝理性思考，缺乏基本分析判断能力，喜欢给别人乱扣帽子，十分符合各组织对其成员的要求。

月之女祭司

$ r% U( r& C4 c1 Q/ f' }# G3 R原来坚持认为地震目前还不可预测就是五毛了，那感情世界上所有权威学术机构都是五毛了。既然都那么懒得查，我就贴在这里了：

1 o# m- W& m0 T+ X& j- `. ]! v+ }; _http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake_prediction
8 N& ?5 `2 C7 E
An earthquake prediction is a prediction that an earthquake of a specific magnitude will occur in a particular place at a particular time (or ranges thereof). Despite considerable research efforts by seismologists, scientifically reproducible predictions cannot yet be made to a specific day or month.[1] However, for well-understood faults seismic hazard assessment maps can estimate the probability that an earthquake of a given size will affect a given location over a certain number of years.[2] The overall ability to predict earthquakes either on an individual basis or on a statistical basis remains remote.
% D/ z  \) L* U/ K& Q

- {. @: z9 }2 }* {; g: vHistory of prediction attempts
8 ^8 N8 |. a( W+ T" t, E[edit] China
" a- Q$ ^: d1 i! @
+ L1 ^' D5 b( |, jAfter a series of foreshocks, the Chinese government was able to successfully evacuate much of the populace before the 1975 Haicheng earthquake. However, the Chinese government failed to predict the July 28, 1976 M7.8 Tangshan earthquake, which put Chinese earthquake prediction research in doubt for several years.
* O* V9 p: s9 ]+ ~$ U1 `0 H7 H
In the late 1990s, the Chinese government issued over thirty false alarms,[22] but claimed successful prediction of the November 29, 1999, M5.4 Gushan-Pianling Earthquake in Haicheng city and Xiuyan city, Liaoning Province.[23]
[edit] Japan
* ~: U: @" A* V4 I
' Q2 h" J7 p( l6 h8 i$ v5 iIn the 1970s and 1980s, the Japanese government embarked on a major earthquake preparedness campaign, which some criticized as emphasizing prediction too much over mitigation.[24] It failed to result in a prediction of the Great Hanshin earthquake which devastated the city of Kobe in 1995.
[edit] Failed Lima prediction

; {) A# K7 T) `9 QAn earthquake predicted by a scientist at the U.S. Bureau of Mines to occur on June 28, 1981, in Lima, Peru, failed to materialize. Despite being dismissed by the U.S. National Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council, the prediction caused popular fear and many left the city.[25]
[edit] Failed Parkfield earthquake prediction
Main article: Parkfield earthquake
# @, ^& ?9 G% c/ x
Based on a history of regularly spaced earthquakes in the early 20th century, the USGS in 1985 began an experiment based on the predictions and published papers of Allan Lindh and W.H. Bakun of the USGS and T.V. McEvilly of the University of California at Berkeley. The goal was to predict a 6.0 magnitude earthquake near Parkfield, California.[26]

    "Bakun and Lindh summarized the state of the art in the Parkfield Prediction Experiment, and predicted that a moderate-size earthquake would occur at Parkfield between 1985 and 1993. Their prediction was unusual both in its precision (as to location, time and magnitude) and high degree of confidence (95% within the 9-year window). Bakun and Lindh (1985) also suggested that the predicted earthquake could produce extended rupture of the San Andreas fault to the southeast, possibly growing to magnitude 6.5 to 7.0."[27]
& x! \# J, G, H- w
Media attention focused on the prediction and the experiment. 122,000 pamphlets were mailed to residents of the Parkfield area, entitled "The Parkfield Earthquake Prediction."[28] Despite the prediction, such an earthquake did not occur until after the end of the prediction window, in 2004.[1]
[edit] Loma Prieta prediction

From 1968 to 1988 scientists in California mapped seismic activity on a cross section of the fault lines. They identified a "seismic gap" in the Loma Prieta area from various features of the regional seismicity. They therefore concluded that Loma Prieta was due for an earthquake.[citation needed] Smaller quakes several months beforehand were treated as possible foreshocks, but the warnings had expired by the date of the moment magnitude 6.9 quake, on 17 October 1989.[1]
Further information: 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake
' V3 y7 O7 `& P6 N" D7 f: ]4 I3 X[edit] Failed New Madrid prediction by Iben Browning
' ]' p; [8 }, ]+ ~! h+ ?$ z+ Z
In 1989 Iben Browning predicted a major earthquake in the New Madrid fault zone of southern Missouri and specified December 2 or 3, 1990, as the most likely days. This prediction was reported on extensively in the media and lead to great community concern. No earthquake occurred on those days or thereafter.
8 e- W: Q! v+ A7 O0 N[edit] Jim Berkland
0 ?  y, C. O) n: B# t1 C
Jim Berkland claims to have predicted the Loma Prieta quake,[29] but the mainstream scientific community does not endorse his techniques as repeatable, attributing his success with this quake partly to random chance.
[edit] Failed SoCal prediction
9 ~- }. a2 I! `
3 W" O* r( y* s% c& `In early 2004, a group of scientists at the University of California, Los Angeles, led by Dr. Vladimir Keilis-Borok, predicted that a quake similar in strength to the San Simeon earthquake of 2003 would occur in a 12,000 square mile (31,100 km) area of Southern California by September of that year. The odds were given as 50/50.

In April 2004, the California Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council (CEPEC) evaluated Keilis-Borok's prediction and reported to the California State Office of Emergency Services.[30] CEPEC concluded that the "uncertainty along with the large geographic area included in the prediction (about 12,400 square miles) leads (us) to conclude that the results do not at this time warrant any special policy actions in California.” The predicted time window came and went with no significant earthquake.
[edit] L'Aquila controversy

1 @1 c" [. D* w# Q8 `Giampaolo Giuliani claims to have predicted the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake. He was reported to Italian police for "causing fear" but he was acquitted [31]. His prediction was dismissed by scientists and politicians as a fluke.[32]